<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Google Under Review by Texas Attorney General</title>
		<description>Discuss Google Under Review by Texas Attorney General</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Latest/Google-Under-Review-by-Texas-Attorney-General.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/566/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Terry Van Horne says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Latest/Google-Under-Review-by-Texas-Attorney-General.html#comment-2093</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree Alysson one would hope the AG of TX would have better things to do. If you look at the pic the second result after the Shopping Pak.. is Nextag a very good comparison engine!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Terry Van Horne</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Latest/Google-Under-Review-by-Texas-Attorney-General.html#comment-2093</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Even if they were, so what?</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Latest/Google-Under-Review-by-Texas-Attorney-General.html#comment-2329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I will agree these are nothing more than nuisance suits. Look, Google can show whatever they want to in their search results and in any order that strikes their fancy. SEOs may hate that and owners of sites that don't perform as well as they'd like may hate that, but it is THEIR index. It is THEIR algorithm. THEY are creating the experience THEY want THEIR users to have. Google doesn't belong to you. Google belongs to its shareholders. Therefore Google's primary responsibility is to increase the value of its stock and pay higher dividends to its shareholders. A secondary goal may also be to take over the world Cyberdyne Systems style, but that's more of a long term thing and not really something you highlight in a public mission statement. Attempting to force them to "show this", "don't show that" or "must show more of this" is tantamount to telling a business owner that if he is going to have a display of his products in his front window, he must also display his competitors products. It's nonsense. And I just had to take Google's side on something. Which is also nonsense. And even more reason to be annoyed by the aforementioned nuisance lawsuits. Our tax dollars hard at work!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alysson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Latest/Google-Under-Review-by-Texas-Attorney-General.html#comment-2329</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
