<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>SEOs say NO to reciprocal links!</title>
		<description>Discuss SEOs say NO to reciprocal links!</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/434/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>don\'t be fooled</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When done properly recip links can still be very beneficial. Automated links suck and links from links pages generally suck, but I will take a link from the Wall Street Journal any day - even if it means I have already linked to them from somewhere on my site (like a blog post).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Arnie K</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1821</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Web Writer </title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1820</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is true that reciprocal links are not as valuable as they used be in regard in SEO. However, reciprocal links with related sites do seem to help out.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Misty</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1820</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nick Stamoulis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1828</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think reciprocal links work when they are done naturally mixed in with a variety of SEO efforts. That is when you can expect to see the most from your efforts.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1828</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SeoNext says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1823</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is very much true that there is no use for reciprocal links.Really a good post.Thanks for sharing such info with us.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SeoNext</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1823</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1814</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well Nick, as I said, generally speaking I don't really use them these days... but I suppose if the right situation came along, one might consider it. Especially if it is highly relevant and the content/site is of benefit to my users... I'd even give a straight link if contacted and I liked the offering. There are always exceptions to the rule, that's the limitation of polls. I'd also consider the activity ROI - if one was doing them, then consideration to the benefit and high targets would be the call of the day.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Internet-Marketing/Link-Building/SEOs-say-NO-to-reciprocal-links.html#comment-1814</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
