<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>The Greenpeace PageRank Lottery</title>
		<description>Discuss The Greenpeace PageRank Lottery</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/407/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Be cautious!</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This kind of articles is good for awareness for the online lottery player also. Because in online lottery is now contained with number of scams. So it needs to control to make Online Lottery available and acceptable to all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sumit</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tempest in a teapot</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1632</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry Dave, but they're offering links to whoever comes up with the best content. That's like saying you're gonna do a link roundup n for people to get in, they have to vie for a spot by producing great content, and also link to you. Trading links is and has always been fine, in moderation and done judiciously. Here the links will be relevant, so imho this is (maybe unintentionally ?) manufactured controversy... p.s. No, I'm not some hardcore Greenpeace lover.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Gab Goldenberg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1632</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>belajar seo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1616</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They're pretty clever though. I read it before and didn't think it's link trading. Your post opened my eyes - they'll regret starting this competition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>belajar seo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1616</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rusli zainal sang visioner says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1615</link>
			<description><![CDATA[great oppinion, It clearly violates the spirit and several terms of Google's guidelines. Then again pretty much any attempt to attract links, does. So this could go either way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>rusli zainal sang visioner</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1615</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Guidance or not ..I link it!</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1578</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Violating or not the google guidance... I think I will link it anyway...the cause may be is stronger then all of this and sure this strategy will work...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1578</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hurtownia Tkanin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1557</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They're pretty clever though. I read it before and didn't think it's link trading. Your post opened my eyes - they'll regret starting this competition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Hurtownia Tkanin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1557</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>seriously...</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1553</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Greenpeace are hardly aiming to get traffic off that keyword phrase. Nobody looking to donate money is going to use those terms. I genuinely believe it isn't done in a malicious way and also that nothing stops you asking for a link. It's a non-profit, it's not malicious, it isn't going to hurt anyone...I'm happy to just let them be and hope it works for them. A bold move and I applaud it :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1553</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>mr.</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1548</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i did a google for: fish and mercury air pollution carbon credits and all failed to bring up a reference to Green Peace. even 'save the whales' only showed them as #6]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hempoilguy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1548</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Virginia says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Go GreenPeace! I agree, Dave, that they're not in the dark on this. They have a clear understanding of how links can effect ranking and how to leverage it. While the Google TOS question still stands, I'm impressed that a "traditional" organization (one not born in the Internet age) has adapted to -- no, mastered! -- life online. Even if it wasn't a game for a worthy cause, I'm inclined to think that contests like this are innovative means of online commerce. Google, however, may disagree!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Virginia</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1547</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anything for the Cause</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm sure I'll be firebombed for this but I'm not really surprised that Greenpeace would have no qualms in breaking rules and guidelines to advance their cause. There's a long history with their organization pushing the limits and breaking laws for their agenda...this is them taking that ideology onto the web... I think that it would be shameful for Google NOT to take action, because it would signal that politics/activism is more important to them than maintaining a rational set of guidelines.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Foot In Mouth</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/News/Marketing-News/The-Greenpeace-PageRank-Lottery.html#comment-1546</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
