<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Guide to Search Engine Ranking Factors</title>
		<description>Discuss Guide to Search Engine Ranking Factors</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/398/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>laptop computer battery  says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-2006</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another maybe the amount of personalization data being collected dependant on browser and toolbar set up. These all have subtle indications of where ones search optimization tasks may need to evolve.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>laptop computer battery </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-2006</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The W3C compliance is a SEO factor</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-2606</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The W3C compliance is a SEO factor. I had a client in Mexico that his Website's PHP code was terrible, We chaged everything, We built the Website from 0 but we kept the same Urls, same day we chaged the code, his visits jumped 500% and staed there. after I had some problem with one his manager and we stop working with them, after they changed back to the old code now they have very few visits. This proves me that the clean code is a SEO factor..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rafael Montilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-2606</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Link Building says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-2325</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Surely a insightful article. Rather I would say it a shorter yet brief version of the whole SEO course =). Okay, I need some more clarifications when you talk about PR (Page Rank). As per my understanding, you're treating PR and back links separately? Based on the little know I have, I believe more the relevant links you have better the PR. So in a nutshell, good PR shouldn't help you gain top positions over SERP which you actually receive by means of good yet relative link building? any thoughts?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Link Building</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-2325</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cloaking of URL\'s</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1838</link>
			<description><![CDATA[=) Excellent in detail for readily assimilation. One question? Under the heading Web Spam Detection method 2 cloaking Please explain why this method would lead to loss of rankings or much more than that. Especially when cloaking usage is encurraged for affiliate programs to avoid piracy of earnigs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ziedonis Paegle</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1838</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>John Huff Deisgns</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1483</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lots of good things here. One request, make the text darker for us with eye strain or older eyes. Thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>John Huff</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1483</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google and their leaning towards search histories</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1473</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I know Google$ are constantly looking for ways to link in different sets of information they collect but if they raise the relevance of personal search histories and the like then it could really throw a spanner in the SEO works - it will be yet another thing that means you and your customer will see different search results and that spells problems for SEOs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Aaron Reynolds</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1473</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No probs folks.... just thinking out loud and trying to work things out for myself - I thought to bring everyone along for the ride!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Managing Director</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Excellent! Just in time for a presentation I am giving. Made my job easier!:cheer:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>L Thomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Awesome!</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really appreciate you taking the time to research and post all this. This is great information and I've certainly learned and been reminded of certain seo rules of thumb. Thank you again!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tim Johnson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cut to the chase</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Know what I like about what's presented here ... everything you need and none of the fluff. Really, we don't need every point with in-your-face detail. Thanks!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Anne Macindoe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Guide-to-Search-Engine-Ranking-Factors.html#comment-1472</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
