<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>New Algo Changes at Google</title>
		<description>Discuss New Algo Changes at Google</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/395/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Changes at google</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-2320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's getting more cluttered day by day. The constant changes must be confusing for people less experienced on the web. At least they're not using huge colours and images yet. Oh wait, that'll be the news, video and images results they add in too! The pure google results looked so much more minimalist - which at the time was their success. Now it seems clutter and multi-dimnesional results are important. That time line thing that lists tweets or blogs is most bizarre. As long as the results improve. Geo- has been off for months and there's some scummy sites in the lists.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-2320</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sedum plants says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1837</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Google needs to chill and let people decide more about it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sedum plants</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1837</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>get backlinks</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1865</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think Google has it about right as far as the length of the snippet, I do wish there was a way to tell it what you what the snippet to be.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>get backlinks</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1865</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Earn Money Online says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't think Google is trying to hijack your content, but rather display it in a manner that viewers that are trying to search it up, are able to pull which is the best for their search.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Earn Money Online</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nick Stamoulis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1449</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think a longer snippet will be ok as long as it doesn't jeopardize how the search results impact user experience.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1449</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sue</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1422</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, as long as websites are prosecuted for stealing other peoples content (they are being closed down here).... I reckon it might be interesting to see someone sueing Google for copyright violation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1422</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jacek says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well it depends how far will these changes go. If it is ony one more line for phrases of more than 5 words - then I dont think it will influence SEO or any other points of view too much. The problem may be wider - the recent changes that we have been noticing for the past few months (first advert on Google home page, brands favoring, websites promoting for logged users) prove that Google is constantly improving / changing its algorithms, now in a delicate way, but may eventually make more drastic changes that will be experienced by the whole SEO industry.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jacek</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1421</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HTML is an open format</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One cannot reasonably expect to publish content in an open format and prevent that content from being scraped. That's all there is to it, really. At least Google reciprocates in this fashion by allowing their results to be scraped and stripped of ads. It's all for the greater good of the open internet in my opinion. Copyright and the Internet Protocol were never intended to cross paths, and now that they do it's a sloppy mismatch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>is it true????</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1433</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i do't know more about it.but google can do anything.it can change algo on a specific time,we can not know but we can think about it.if it is true then it is a bad news for bloggers... :s :s :s]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The Film Wall</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1433</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Or maybe .. it\'s the other way round!</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1407</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey there, it's kind of an interesting theory you have there. At first I thought I'm gonna agree with you as a webmaster / SEO / whathaveyou. But then I looked at it from a user's perspective. Mainly when googling for "pizza heidelberg" (that's a city in good ol' Germany) I get lots of results from wannabe SEO directories that don't really provide me with any content on where I can grab a proper Pizza in Heidelberg. So, if there were actually 5 lines of content I think I could figure out whether the content on the target page was actually man- rather than machine-made. I'd never really trust the snippet Google presents me cause I'd seriously be afraid that I'm missing something important on the page. Very often in history peoples' statements have been taken out of context and therefore meant something totally else. So as a user that is of value to a specific site I'd check the site out. Those users that don't read the description or don't care whether the information is trustworthy are not the ones about to buy a product from your page or click on your ads etc. From a user's point of view this might help me to distinguish proper content from spam and from a webmaster's view this migth help me sort out those people that come via google and leave a second after - they just cost me traffic, I don't win anything from them. Greetings from Germany]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Etienne Germany</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/New-Algo-Changes-at-Google.html#comment-1407</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
