<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Spam  detection using historical factors</title>
		<description>Discuss Spam  detection using historical factors</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/315/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Daniel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-2763</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I like your info, however, I am not agree to consider blog commenting as a way of putting a link in secret. NO, blog owners are the one admiting the entrace of that links into their sites in other words it is most of the time editorially given. They usually do it because you give content to their sites. Moreover with this method you are getting involved into the community. In these days there are no auto-approved blogs. In my case, I reject all those who try to put keywords instead of the name. And for those bloggers who remove the no follow attribute that is their problem and google should not take those links as spam.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-2763</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Very much right...</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-533</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the google, yahoo or any other search engine..all have their own filters to search whether the post we make is spam or not..also if we copy something from other authors, it is also taken as spamming...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Serbian</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-533</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-1041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey Kay... whaddya say? All of the major engines have published a variety of works on historical/temporal factors; so the wise SEO should at least be mindful of some of the potential signals search engines watch for. As always, natural is a sign of a quality website and they have all the data in the world to use to get mean averages... comparison over time is a logical approach. ..tnx fer dropping in GF :woohoo:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-1041</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>how do you get inside my head?</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-1039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the only reliable and potentially sustainable strategy is to replicate a natural backlinking process, this post is spot on. is it natural for a hug bunch of links to appear overnight on one 'type' of resource? absolutely not. if our little brains can come to that conclusion so immediately of course it would have been considered by those many wizard programmer types behind SE algo's. thanks for the detailed explanation dude. i really must remember to refer more people to your posts to back up why i dont apply the crazed loon seo strategy for my clients]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Search-Engine-Optimization/Spam-detection-using-historical-factors.html#comment-1039</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
