<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Stay off the LSI bandwagon</title>
		<description>Discuss Stay off the LSI bandwagon</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/151/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Michael Schwartz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html#comment-2753</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking back on it it certainly seems like the semantic issue is overplayed. Just focus on building quality content and the links will come.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Michael Schwartz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html#comment-2753</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>theGypsy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html#comment-194</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While the computational shortcomings are part of why folks like Micheal poo-poo the whole thing, I don’t have a problem with people in the SOE world learning about such methods. What does start to get bothersome is people providing services and using LSI as some sort of catch phrase to blind clients with fancy lexicons. I love reading the technical stuff, but there is no ‘magic bullet’ there IMO. Some internet marketers jump to easily to conclusions. It’s simply part of the education/passion for me - not magic bullets. (thanks for dropping by :0)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>theGypsy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html#comment-194</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>semantics</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html#comment-193</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The semantic issue is over-played largely because it isn't possible to get computers to parse the language the way humans want to. You're probably right, until a computer can make sense of a sentence.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Smith</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Stay-off-the-LSI-bandwagon.html#comment-193</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
