<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Tale of the two PageRank Patents</title>
		<description>Discuss Tale of the two PageRank Patents</description>
		<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.huomah.com/feed/com_content/129/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>very nice, and thanks</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pity about the masses of smoke I eagerly cut mny way through there, but this “wherein the matrix A is chosen so that an importance rank of a web page document is calculated, in part, from a constant .alpha. representing the probability that a surfer will randomly jump to the web page document. “ ..was interesting. Appreciate your digging around there Dave, and thanks Bill for putting it out there first of all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>f-lops-y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Smoke but no fire</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I was curious if there was a 'fast one' but it is mostly late additions and clarifications to pretect future claims from what I saw. Enjoy the time off... leaving the cable behind could be a sign.... enjoy it. Dave]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The Gypsy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks. Much Appreciated</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-153</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was surprised to see this update, but it looked more like a cleaning up exercise than an exposition of unknown and new attributes to pagerank. The idea in the original of showing the pagerank of pages in results sets would have been interesting, but I wonder what affect it would have had if ever adopted by a search engine like Google. Thanks very much for comparing the two, Dave.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-153</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Twilight SEO</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-152</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Aahhh.. that's the useless bits like TBPR, Meta-KW tags, sandboxes right down to the completely scammy 'submit your site to a zilion search engines' crap that we know and love so well. I said the other day I felt like I was in the Twilight Zone and it kinda stuk on me.... Basically the stuff from my SEO Myths and Bad SEO posts.... he he....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The Gypsy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-152</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Infamous Dave</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok Dave, what the hell is ‘Twilight Zone’ SEO?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>waveshoppe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>It's a Mad world</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why thank you brother MadHat…. While my other companies kept me busy, much of it was simply a breather from the wacky world of search, publicly at least. Alas, ‘Twilight Zone’ SEO and other silliness has sent me back ranting. What can U do? I get so passionate about this stuff. See if I can’t come up with something worthy of Friday tea time….]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The Gypsy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Aaron says:</title>
			<link>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:zzz Welcome back! Long time no see!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.huomah.com/Search-Engines/Algorithm-Matters/Tale-of-the-two-PageRank-Patents.html#comment-149</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
