SEO Blog - Internet marketing news and views  

the SEO Geeks Newsletter is Rocking

Written by David Harry   
Tuesday, 07 April 2009 17:09

Just a quick note for a Tuesday to mention that the SEO Geeks Newsletter has been going great. While likely a humble number compared to many of the big dogs in the space, but we're up over 400 subscribers so far - Who knew that many peeps cared about the geekier side of search engine optimization? Sweeeet.... I've pretty juiced about some of the feedback so far and the kinds words recieved

Thanks for the luvin

Thanks so much to those following along - I hope to keep improving it as we go! I'd also like to thank our early sponsors, IM Spring Break, Raven SEO Tools, Your Members (WP plugin from Tim Nash) and Rank Sense - if you're interested in becoming a sponsor; get in touch.

We've also been putting past editions in Dojo - see the Newsletter Archive - that should give you and idea of the goodiness we're putting out each week. If you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to the newsletter and get your weekly SEO Geek fix!

As for the Trail, we have some coverage tomorrow on some very interesting patents on Host level Spam detection - cya then!

 

 

Matt Cutts talks about the Brandy Update

Written by David Harry   
Wednesday, 04 March 2009 20:28

..erm.. I mean 'Vince's Simple Change'

Hey kids... Matt put up a vid as part of the grab bag series and focuses on the 'Brandy' update (funniest name I heard so far, going with it)

I decided to quickly transcribe it for you - First the video and then the transcription and a few thoughts...

As expected, he states that they aren't so much targeting brands as only certain elements were tweaked that gives this appearance. He also reiterates that it's only in certain query spaces that this is happening.

"Inside of Google, at least inside the search ranking team, we don't really think about brands. We think about words like 'trust' 'authority' 'reputation' 'PageRank' 'high quality'.

The Google philosophy on search results has been the same, pretty much forever, is that somebody comes to Google and types in X, we want to return high quality information about X. And sometimes that's a brand search, sometimes that's an informational search, sometimes it's navigational, sometimes it's transactional."

"First off, YES, Google has made a change in our rankings, it's one of over 3-400 we make very year. So, I wouldn't call it an 'update', I would call it a simple change. If you have to refer to it, one of the people that did a lot of work on it, his name is Vince. This particular change, we talk about it as 'Vince's change' within the Googleplex.

I wouldn't really call it an update, but there has been a change in how we do some rankings. It doesn't affect a vast majority of queries, it's more likely, and most people haven't noticed it. I mean Aaron talked about it and I think even before that people at WebMasterWorld were talking about it. But it affects a relatively small number of queries, it's not like it affects a ton of long-tail queries or anything like that.

I don't think of it as putting more weight on brands. We don't really think about 'brands' in search quality that much. For example if you type 'eclipse', if Google were really focused on brands we'd return 'Mitsubishi Eclipse' at number one, or something like that.

And if you actually GO to Google and type in 'eclipse', we've got eclipse.org cause there's a development environment. We've got Nasa's eclipse website, and then there are some commercial results. For example, 'eclipse' is the name of that book in the Twilight series, so we've got a page from Amazon.

It's not that we always try to return brands. We try to return whatever we think the best results are for users. So, the net upshot of this change is pretty simple, we try to return high quality results. We think about trust, reputation, authority, PageRank and so what you should be doing doesn't change. Try to make a great site, try to make it the site that is sooo fantastic that you become an authority in your niche.

And it doesn't have to be a big nice. It doesn't have to be a huge, well known, key word. It can still be a smaller niche, that's the thing people are going to want to link to, that they'll talk about, the sort of things people really enjoy. Those are the sort of sites, the experts, that we want to bring back"

Brandy Update or is it Vince?

 

For me... I am still seeing talk of 'query types' and 'authority' here. Sure, we really aren't learning a helluva lot beyond what we did already, I just can't shake the feeling that this is 'trust' and query dependent related.

My main candidates at this point;

1. Trust factors such as domain age
2. TrustRank type concepts (linkage)
3. Query analysis (navigational, transactional)and query context

Other items that hold potential

1. Personalized PageRank (clustering)
2. Named entities concepts (and semantic relations)
3. Historical factors (including link velocity)

So, what did YOU make of it? Wonderfully crafter political prose? Or are there nuggets in the statement that tell us anything more than we knew already?

 

A Search geeks guide to Google brand bias

Written by David Harry   
Monday, 02 March 2009 08:51

More reasons for SEOs to learn about IR

The recent buzz around the SEO space is the (poorly termed) ‘Google brand algo’ which has been more than a little strange. As usual the blog regurgitators are talking in circles, donning tin foil hats and otherwise missing the mark as far as what is happening (some wild theories out there).

Now, I am (obviously) not disputing the recent changes that took place as even Matt, in his usual way, stated there are adaptations that could be producing such an effect (reminds me of the sandbox). That doesn’t bother me. And to be honest, Aaron’s assessment is fine as well, though a little over-the-top, tin foil hat flavouring for me. He terms it as an algo update; which works fine.

My bitch, (as always) is how some SEOs are now talking about the ‘brand algo’ and theories on what is causing the effect (one person even asked if ‘bounce rates’ were the cause *#$&@ ) which does little to make us look like we know much about search engines beyond how to spell the words. I have already seen more than a few ‘new Google brand algo’ type posts popping up around the blogosphere. Beyond those making up theories as they go, others are using the evil empire corporate agenda angle...also flawed. Please people… stop that would ya?

Does Google have a brand bias?

 

 

the SEO Dojo is coming soon!

Written by David Harry   
Monday, 23 February 2009 11:17

Taking search optimization training to the next level

In case you missed the subtle hint in the last post, we're working on some thing VERY special for search geeks far and wide.

Here's your hint (click on the pic);

HuoMah SEO Dojo

 

Introducing the SEO Geeks Newsletter

Written by David Harry   
Monday, 23 February 2009 10:03

For the longest time peeps had asked if I had or was planning a SEO newsletter for the geeks that wanted to stay on top of the latest technical goodies. The answer has always been a flat "No... didn't think that many people cared about it". We've gotten to the point where it's been asked enough times that my thinking was...well...flawed (gasp). Apparently there are a multitude of search geeks that want just that... to that end I am launching the SEO Geeks Newsletter.

SOSG Alert

To start with we have (being the seed that it is);

  • News and insight from around the SEO world
  • Latest search patent news
  • Updates on related research papers
  • Tips and tricks from top level SEOs
  • Exclusive offers from around the web.
  • Tool alerts and reviews
  • And of course progress on the Dojo launch (another secret exposed!)

That last one is another subtle announcement... to learn more you'll have to go and see for yourself

The first newsletter is set to go out on my birthday; March 02 2009 - so give me an early present and go sign up for the newsletter.

 
<< Start < 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 > End >>

Page 8 of 16

Search the Site

SEO Training

Tools of the Trade

Banner
Banner
Banner

On Twitter

Follow me on Twitter