I tell ya… this is a whacky business we are in (those in SEO at least) – Not so long ago the spectre that is the death of ranking reports raised it’s conventionally wise head – which we poo poo’d here in this space for a few reasons.
A little history…
Back in August, when last we noted this anomaly, this was born; the Evolution of SEO
Which, while acknowledging the need for geo-targeting and analytics, we put forth the theory that all is not lost (just evolved)… and even took some flak for that position.
But that wasn’t enough so some volunteers pitched in and we realized, ‘Yes Virginia, rankings DO matter’ and also outlined some take-away’s from the (limited) study. The next round of these, a more expanded research session, starts next week and we’ll see where it leads.
Who killed ranking reports?
Now, there is no way I am delusional, nor in denial. One thing I am known for is being a recovering personalized search addict and have covered it extensively as with other behavioural metrics that search engines use these days. This is about having the tightest grasp on the art of SEO as one possibly can, not about fantastical statements.
This is where the rubber really does hit the road my fine reader; the death of ranking reports is premature and over-stated. What research we have done shows that behavioural metrics (SERP interactions, query revisions) and geo-location factors are having as much of an effect on re-rankings as personalization does in many query spaces.
BUT… and it’s a HUGE one, it is not some massive flux that serves drastically different results to different users. This simply is not evident as things are far more subtle than that (download the entire Google re-ranking study).
No, this isn’t 2004 and new tactics are required and new valuations of indicators such as rankings are warranted. This is a given – but it may be premature to throw the baby out with the bath water. I advise you do some of your own research with as many people in your target demographic to establish mean average rankings for core terms and see for your self.
Before you run around spreading new myths… take a look for yourself. That’s all I ask…
Here’s Bruce Clay talking about the ‘Death of Ranking Reports’
Here’s Matt not altogether agreeing by saying rankings aren't as importance as they once were
If Bruce has actually done some detailed research into SERP re-ranking and personalization; I’d love to see it. If not, then I am left with the research we’ve been doing. This shows that there are certainly re-ranking mechanisms at play, just not rampant.
He does discuss geo-location issues, which is something we’ve known for a while as he does analytics (we all know my obsession with analytics for SEO). There is much I do agree with… it’s simply this talk of rampantly diverse SERPs that negate the value of (mean) rankings. We haven’t seen this (at this point in the research).
Even the gang at SEW decided to jump on the bandwagon but this wouldn’t be the first time we’ve chastised the fine folks at SEW of late for sensationalism.
What should U do?
I would be sure to try and isolate local servers/data centers to where your SEO efforts are aimed. Even go to the extent of having some locals search some terms for you. Either way, seek out a mean average and think more in terms of ‘above the fold’ for mean averages.
Ranking analysis still holds an obvious role in the SEO process, it’s simply not as obvious and likely less of a metric than in the past – on life support – not dead.