Written by David Harry
Tuesday, 17 August 2010 15:54
The most recent poll over in the SEO Dojo was related to an article I wrote over on the WordStream blog a while back titled; Google is getting past the link
The premise of the piece was that we may be on the precipice of a world where Google puts less reliance on links and starts to consider other signals. Which made me curious as to what the rest of the search space felt about that. Thus the poll;
Will Google ever get over links?
Here's how the answers broke down;
- 64.1% Nope not any time soon
- 17.2% Caffeine means more signals
- 10.9% Not yet, but coming soon
- 4.7% Yes they have to for relevance
- 3.1% Yes, SEOs have destroyed PR signals
First off, the funny part for me, was the response the original article recieved. Most folks seemed to agree with me that Google would be evolving past the present addiction. That wasn't entirely borne out in the poll results. With that, only 36% seemed to believe such.
After that, it does seem that most believe that via caffeine or otherwise, that an change may be on the horizon. So why do most of the folks believe Google can't get past the link? Is that because it is so ingrained in our collective conciousness? Is it because they have no faith in Google? It's hard to say. I am going with the former.
What I can tell you is that the IR world itself really doesn't talk about search/ranking in terms of linkage over the last few years. I would venture a guess we most certainly will see a shift... time will tell. Please do head on over to the Dojo and take this week's poll; Are you utilizing RDFa and microformats yet? (right hand side)
What do YOU think? Sound off in the comments.