Ok enough is enough. Over the last 24hrs no less than 3 major websites, (and many smaller ones) have been ranting about Google ranking new content over older index entries. Am I the only person that finds this BIG NEWS less than exciting? I mean I have understood through most of last year that there were temporal effects that had newer entries/content additions ranking early but slowly fading over time if new links arent flowing in or the content reasonably updated. We have been watching this for some time now.
This is another great illustration of how the masses seem to think that there is a single algorithm at work. The folks at Mashable are talking about the PageRank algorithm being broken which is just so far from reality it nearly nauseating. This has very little to do with PageRank and more to do with a variety of layered algos and a temporal parameter to the weighting system. To be calling them artificially inflated is simply ignorant. WTF is so freaking artificial? Why do people seem to keep assuming that all things lead to PageRank?
I have covered so many patents over the last few years that in whole, or in part, bring a wide variety of potential ranking factors, (signals) into the mix beyond PR, so why the confusion? I personally believe, that a heavily skewed PR world of ranking left us way back in early 2006. There is simply nothing new here for anyone that is in the trenches ranking sites 24/7. This phenomenon has been in play for quite a while.
Lets have a closer look at this so-called SERP evidence; January 1 tcp/ip
I am sorry, but this is not really much evidence of anything but how some bandwagon jumpers can board a no-name search term that probably had few searches, little revenue potential and will once again be worthless in 6 months when all this bullshit dies down. Now if you can do that with say a term like buy viagra or Brittney Spears then it would be some freakin news now wouldnt it? Go ahead I dare you; Buy Viagra . Now go make a Blog post and get me ranking for that in a day
You could even go by somewhere like Digital Point Forums and see something like this on a given day;
Poster: Gee.. I rank Top 10 for a page I just put a couple days ago. This is great.
Answer; Dont worry, it wont last. Pages tend to start high and then slowly sink off over time.
I mean, really, even the folks at DP get it; but today it is somehow BIG NEWs??? That's gotta hurt. Man, we are getting bored huh? Things have simply been too quiet since the last Paid Links Brew-ha-ha and the natives are getting restless it seems.
Old News is Good News
I am not even going to begin to look to explain what factors could be involved as more rampant speculation seems haphazard at this point. Ultimately I am inclined to believe it is a combination of query and data analysis algorithms that have a temporal element incorporated and said layer(s) had the dials turned (weighting increase) over the last while. This is a HUGE LEAP from making silly statements such as PageRank being broken or the SERPs being artificially enhanced in some way. I do think there is some interesting tidbits in the post over at BlogStorm that at least in part has some legs. Even with that theory, it may only be News Sites and Blogs that have said effect.
What this does show is that much of the algorithmic decision making process can be linked back to user performance metrics (UPMs) and query logs. It involves understanding which topics are hot or which user types prefer there information newer as opposed to older authority themes. It can also use query data to statistically determine what topics may be a temporal hot spot. This simply is not new though, if you are paying attention to the ever changing landscape via a technical search approach, this would already be understood as far as being a factor in ones SEO activities.
Now get back to freakin work and stop wasting my time with this utter garbage that is just another excuse to put GOOGLE in a post whilst seemingly sounding off as some type of adventurer that has just discovered the new world. You aint found JACK that hasnt already been part of the landscape, to varied degrees, for some time now!
. more important things to be doing with myself
Heres the Help; ( and really.... I could post dozens)
BlogStorm - the Google Algorithm isnt Changing
Bill Slawski - Google on Generating Statistics from Engine Query Logs
Reliable SEO - A Probabilistic Learning Model
Heres the Hype;
TechCrunch - The Google Algorithm is ChangingWebPro News - Watch the video even.. nice editorial integrity folks
Mashable - PageRank Gone Awry
GoogleSystem - Google Artificially promotes recent web pages
Web Metric Guru Articifiacial rankings
Lost Remote - Timely links appearing higher in Google Rank